Re: ispman-HEAD tasks cleanup
Paul Wolstenholme <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.isp.ispman.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 5, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Wim Kerkhoff wrote: > Paul Wolstenholme wrote: > >> I'm quite new to ispman. I've only been using it for a few months. >> The one major change I've made to my installation revolves around >> using cyrus virtual domains. With this setup, the uid is the same as >> their email address. The changes were not difficult to implement -- >> most of the changes were to ldap templates, control panel, and the >> creation of user directories. If people are interested, I do not >> believe it would be difficult to implement this feature in a way >> which would be compatible with the old model. > > Any idea what would be involved in migrating from uid's of the format > user_domain_told to [email protected]? Currently I have both in LDAP so > that users can authenticate either way through > PAM/Perdition/SMTP/SSH/etc, except for Sieve - which is requiring > user_domain_tld as per the mailboxes. Most of the changes can be made to the templates in ispman/templates. The domain control panel one example where the scripts need to be changed a bit. Basically, I just looked for cases where the uid is merged with the domain. > >> >> There are a couple other ideas I have been thinking of lately as >> well. I have been contemplating setting up a box that uses DAV >> instead of FTP for file transfers. Has anyone done this with ispman? >> I don't think it would be too hard to implement: >> > Sounds interesting... I haven't seen too many webmasters looking for > DAV yet though - most people are stuck in the 'old' way of doing > things. Most operating systems have support along with the big web dev suites. I think it should cut down on tech support (eg firewall problems). It may be a bit more secure (especially if used over ssl). > >> >> I'm also running both apache 1.3 and 2.0 boxes. I'm only using ispman >> with the 2.0 boxes now because they require a different module for >> ldap authentication. It would be great if ispman could handle a >> mixed environment (or maybe it can and I'm just to thick to figure >> it out). > > I have HTTP authentication against LDAP working fine with Apache 1.3. > The relevant portion from vhosts.conf.template: > > <Directory /ispman/analog/$servername> > $ispmanVhostDocumentRootOption > AuthName "Analog WebStats for $servername" > AuthType Basic > AuthLDAPURL ldap://$ldapHost/$ldapBaseDN?uid > require valid-user > ou=users,ispmanDomain=$ispmanDomain,$ldapBaseDN > </Directory> > The block is slightly different for the module I'm using for apache2. I guess I'm just thinking that it would be good to be able to specify a different template depending on the authentication module installed on that box. > Wim > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-developers mailing list > Ispman-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-developers > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFB3yt14vygjarL2QkRAhoRAJ0a7JOHMWFo9YyDWN5otLUuS0lkXQCdFNNV 4dB8RVk0Sp6oGesqCyA8ofY= =uM8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt