Re: sarge

When I installed it 4 Months ago it was true but a change was made that 
asked me witch database to use on a later system install.  I would keep 
it in mind but may no longer be true.

Robert Middleswarth

Rodney Richison wrote:

> Good deal,  after two of you responding, I'll give it another shot. My 
> skills with debian should be improved now.  Kernel 2.6 ?  Or am I just 
> getting greedy now..  ha
>
> BTW, looking over my notes from 8 months ago when I tried this, I have 
> a note from Tony Wassen
> *************
>
> with sarge change your "database ldbm" line to "database bdb" and 
> you'll all set.
> ************
> Is this still true with sarge?
>
> lipilee wrote:
>
>> hi,
>> i'm using sarge and i'm about to have the thing totally set up. if 
>> you have questions, ask.
>> (obviously i don't have a clue on the differences as i'm not using 
>> woody... did i mention i use sarge?...)
>>
>> lip
>>
>> Rodney Richison wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I tried to get ispman to work with sarge some time ago and finally 
>>> gave up.   :)
>>>
>>> Is anyone running it on sarge now and have you any suggestions that 
>>> may differ from the howto?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8