RE: Cornerstone / AltRMI
"Berin Loritsch" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] > > Peter Royal wrote: > > > On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 07:45 AM, Paul Hammant wrote: > > > >> The transport package in the cornerstone project makes Phoenix > >> components of the server side of > >> AltRMI. Given transport is likely to remain alpha like > Altrmi for a > >> while more, would it be > >> simplest to move the classes to the altrmi project? > >> > >> If so Cornerstone could be released as often requested? Thoughts? > > > > > > sounds good to me. > > -pete > > > I think it would be really good if we could get the > cornerstone packages > into a container neutral state before releasing. CornerStone has been around for a while, but never released. We should make a release, and then we can make them container neutral. However, if it is as simple as *not* casting to a BlockContext, then +1, remove the cast. If it consists of more effort, we should do an initial release and then a neutral release.