Re: Cornerstone / AltRMI
Stephen McConnell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Berin Loritsch wrote: >>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>Peter Royal wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 07:45 AM, Paul Hammant wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>The transport package in the cornerstone project makes Phoenix >>>>components of the server side of >>>>AltRMI. Given transport is likely to remain alpha like >>>> >>>> >>Altrmi for a >> >> >>>>while more, would it be >>>>simplest to move the classes to the altrmi project? >>>> >>>>If so Cornerstone could be released as often requested? Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>sounds good to me. >>>-pete >>> >>> >>I think it would be really good if we could get the >>cornerstone packages >>into a container neutral state before releasing. >> >> > >CornerStone has been around for a while, but never released. We >should make a release, and then we can make them container neutral. > > >However, if it is as simple as *not* casting to a BlockContext, >then +1, remove the cast. > >If it consists of more effort, we should do an initial release and >then a neutral release. > > The casting requirements is the only computational issue - the rest is packaging. Cheers, Steve. >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[email protected] http://www.osm.net