Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release
Didier Villevalois <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi >>When asked for my opinion on possible paths to fix I suggested that >>interceptor pattern is the solution. I sent along a couple of links >>(as has Leo) and that should be enough. If there is something missing >>then feel free to ask questions after reading the links I have sent. >> >> > >As I mention in another message, since there appear to be two different >proposals in the offering, it would be helpful to see a TERSE AND PITHY >comparison of them leading to a discussion of what the Community wants to >do; perhaps taking the best ideas from each. > > --- Noel > > Maybe, there is something i did not understand. I really would like to follow the discussion about the lifecycle proposals but... i do not receive any of Peter's mail on the lists users@ and dev@ ??? The two last emails i received were from him are two reply to GUMP failures : one this morning and one on the first of March. But i can see many people reply to him so i can read parts of his replies but not the whole. Is he only sending to PMC's list ?? If yes, this is not fair at all. Thanks. Didier.