Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Didier Villevalois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi

>>When asked for my opinion on possible paths to fix I suggested that
>>interceptor pattern is the solution. I sent along a couple of links
>>(as has Leo) and that should be enough. If there is something missing
>>then feel free to ask questions after reading the links I have sent.
>>    
>>
>
>As I mention in another message, since there appear to be two different
>proposals in the offering, it would be helpful to see a TERSE AND PITHY
>comparison of them leading to a discussion of what the Community wants to
>do; perhaps taking the best ideas from each.
>
>	--- Noel
>  
>
Maybe, there is something i did not understand. I really would like to 
follow the discussion about the lifecycle proposals but... i do not 
receive any of Peter's mail on the lists users@ and dev@ ???
The two last emails i received were from him are two reply to GUMP 
failures : one this morning and one on the first of March. But i can see 
many people reply to him so i can read parts of his replies but not the 
whole. Is he only sending to PMC's list ?? If yes, this is not fair at all.

Thanks. Didier.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.