Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Didier Villevalois wrote:
>>> When asked for my opinion on possible paths to fix I suggested that
>>> interceptor pattern is the solution. I sent along a couple of links
>>> (as has Leo) and that should be enough. If there is something missing
>>> then feel free to ask questions after reading the links I have sent.
>>
>> As I mention in another message, since there appear to be two different
>> proposals in the offering, it would be helpful to see a TERSE AND PITHY
>> comparison of them leading to a discussion of what the Community wants to
>> do; perhaps taking the best ideas from each.
>>
>>
> Maybe, there is something i did not understand. I really would like to 
> follow the discussion about the lifecycle proposals but... i do not 
> receive any of Peter's mail on the lists users@ and dev@ ???
> The two last emails i received were from him are two reply to GUMP 
> failures : one this morning and one on the first of March. But i can see 
> many people reply to him so i can read parts of his replies but not the 
> whole. Is he only sending to PMC's list ?? If yes, this is not fair at all.

nope, I suspect there is something wrong on your end or on the route to 
your end from the asf mail machine. I'm getting these messages, and 
they're arriving through gmane (www.gmane.org) as well; you could use 
the gmane news gateway for reading and posting until we fix this.

cheers,

- Leo