Re: Fwd: AW: [Newbie] Proxy objects in Fortress - why?

Peter Donald wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could someone look at this and apply the changes?

All the BCEL stuff looks complex to say the least,
but code wise it seems ok.

Do we want to have a compile/runtime dependency on
BCEL if for our users' purpose the Dynamic Proxy
version is OK?

Hmm.  We need to perform some runtime resolution
to see if the BCEL jar is available, and if the
user requests it.

Disposing components is pretty important--esp.
if they save state when they are disposed.  Could we
provide that mechanism via a protected or package accessible
method?  WOuld that be sufficient?

Any other questions/answers?