Re: Annotation Attributes

Well, the other question we need to ask is: will there be other types of
annotation in future (Transparent, Foggy, ???). If so, then subclasses
are better than a boolean.

I can't think of any likely new types, though. If nobody else can, then
I'm happy for a single class to represent both types of Annotation;
after all, BCEL is quite heavy enough already!

By the way, I personally prefer "bottom-posting" (replies follow
original) rather than "top-posting" (reply above original). It really
helps when people want to pick up a thread part-way through. And helps
when an email has more than one topic. Of course that's just my personal
opinion...

Regards,

Simon

On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:06 -0500, Dave Brosius wrote:
> As far as I can tell, they are the same.
> 
> 
> > Are there operations that are valid on Visible annotations that are not
> > valid on invisible ones? If so, that would suggest using multiple
> > classes. If not, then I guess I'll stay firmly on the fence :-)
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Simon
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>