Re: Annotation Attributes

"Dave Brosius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel
Message-ID <00d301c509a2$454e2bb0$b17596d1@MBFG>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon Kitching" <[email protected]>


> Well, the other question we need to ask is: will there be other types of
> annotation in future (Transparent, Foggy, ???). If so, then subclasses
> are better than a boolean.

Well, there is one more type, that is RetentionPolicy.SOURCE

Of course, this means that these types of annotations are stripped by the 
compiler, and so bcel never sees them.

I suppose if i start with one class, it wouldn't be that hard to add 
derivation in the future.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.