Re: Annotation Attributes
"Dave Brosius" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00e901c509a4$fd45e530$b17596d1@MBFG> |
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Kitching" <[email protected]> > > >> Well, the other question we need to ask is: will there be other types of >> annotation in future (Transparent, Foggy, ???). If so, then subclasses >> are better than a boolean. Hmm, after further discovery, the design of BCELs Attributes sort of force me down a inheritance solution anyway. So thats my current plan.