Re: [JMeter] JUnit sampler sample time changes

On 3 April 2011 08:32, Ben Cuthbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see the nanotime. But the time in the sampler results is reported in ms. So when you have you data
> it just says 0. I would like it to go one further and report a low level.

Sorry, that's not possible currently.

Changing the elapsed time to nanoSecs would break compatibility, and
such a level of precision is illusory anyway for almost all of the
samplers.

It might be possible to keep a separate field for nanoSeconds and
report that, but I'm not sure there's sufficient need to warrant the
change and additional data storage.

> Regards
> On 2 Apr 2011, at 16:18, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 31 March 2011 19:41, Ben Cuthbert <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> All
>>>
>>> I have been looking over the code in the JUnitSampler code under the jmeter source.
>>> I would like to make a change to use nanoTime() rather than milliseconds.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>> I can see in the AnnotatedTestCase there is an elapsed time. But I can't see how it
>>> is returned to a results table. Any ideas?
>>
>> The time in AnnotatedTestCase is only used for reporting timeout errors.
>>
>> The actual sample time is calculated using SampleResult.sampleStart()
>> and sampleEnd() which already use nanoTime().
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>