Re: [poll] Use Commit Then Review (CTR)
Rob Tompkins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5A151358-1F6B-43A4-8F87-4BEAD14AA051__25218.2395009854$1761578604$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Its all single take voice memo’s with me playing piano. > On Oct 27, 2025, at 10:57 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Gary, > >> On 27.10.2025 14:56, Gary Gregory wrote: >> TL:DR, was AI used to generate this? > > > I often do a couple of back and forth between myself and an AI, > especially when the subject is controversial to smooth my answers. The > initial draft and length is always mine. > > TL;DR: we don't have a CTR-vs-RTC problem, we have a consensus gathering > problem. Switching to CTR won't change anything if we maintain the > requirement of reviewing each commit. > > The consensus gathering problem manifests in two ways: > > - Log4j: some PRs are stuck, because the author disagrees with the > review comments. > - Commons: in case of disagreement, the PR is merged as is and the > reviewer changes it directly in `master`. > > Piotr