Re: [poll] Use Commit Then Review (CTR)

Rob Tompkins <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.devel
Message-ID <5A151358-1F6B-43A4-8F87-4BEAD14AA051__25218.2395009854$1761578604$gmane$org@gmail.com>
Its all single take voice memo’s with me playing piano. 

> On Oct 27, 2025, at 10:57 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gary,
> 
>> On 27.10.2025 14:56, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> TL:DR, was AI used to generate this?
> 
> 
> I often do a couple of back and forth between myself and an AI,
> especially when the subject is controversial to smooth my answers. The
> initial draft and length is always mine.
> 
> TL;DR: we don't have a CTR-vs-RTC problem, we have a consensus gathering
> problem. Switching to CTR won't change anything if we maintain the
> requirement of reviewing each commit.
> 
> The consensus gathering problem manifests in two ways:
> 
> - Log4j: some PRs are stuck, because the author disagrees with the
> review comments.
> - Commons: in case of disagreement, the PR is merged as is and the
> reviewer changes it directly in `master`.
> 
> Piotr
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.