Re: Proposing a 10.3.1 bug fix release
Michael Sokolov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGUSZHA94fd5eN02o6oGCdeD2-oZsR8PCtyhgFkJ-cAZv+iOww@mail.gmail.com> |
It sounds like this is needed. Do we also have any ideas about how we could have avoided this? Should we have some added test coverage, maybe a luceneutil enhancement? Did we already have a test that would have caught but we did not notice? On Wed, Oct 1, 2025, 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > In Elasticsearch, we have detected some of our benchmarks to degrade badly > after upgrading to Lucene 10.3.0. We have nailed down the issue to a bug > <https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15263> in the posting formats > where the impacts returned when there are no frequencies is wrong, leading > to a miscalculation of scores. > > In order to fix this regression, I would like to propose a bug fix release > for 10.3 line. I will be pushing the bug fix today so we can start the > release process as soon as this is done as far as there are no concerns. I > will try to find a release manager or if I cannot I can do it myself. > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > > [image: image.png] >
image.png
(image/png, 165.1 KB) - not displayed