Re: Proposing a 10.3.1 bug fix release
Ignacio Vera <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKryLwuTrakw-403CMDE7ESm29dQVXWs5LCCDKT2_-XqxJ_AUg@mail.gmail.com> |
I have opened this PR that adds a test to check explicitly this case for all the posting formats: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15266 On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 12:43 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > It sounds like this is needed. Do we also have any ideas about how we > could have avoided this? Should we have some added test coverage, maybe a > luceneutil enhancement? Did we already have a test that would have caught > but we did not notice? > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2025, 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In Elasticsearch, we have detected some of our benchmarks to degrade >> badly after upgrading to Lucene 10.3.0. We have nailed down the issue to a >> bug <https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15263> in the posting formats >> where the impacts returned when there are no frequencies is wrong, leading >> to a miscalculation of scores. >> >> In order to fix this regression, I would like to propose a bug fix >> release for 10.3 line. I will be pushing the bug fix today so we can start >> the release process as soon as this is done as far as there are no >> concerns. I will try to find a release manager or if I cannot I can do it >> myself. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ignacio >> >> >> [image: image.png] >> >
image.png
(image/png, 165.1 KB) - not displayed