Re: Are there plans for a Jakarta implementation of the JSTL 1.2 spec
"Henri Yandell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.taglibs.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cool - license wise it's a case of us being able to ship the Glassfish binaries but not the source. I can't see that being a problem in the Java world - except that it means Geronimo are committting themselves to something they can't fork later. Hen On 10/31/06, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Henri ... I think others would find it helpful to have that info > on the site too. > > As far as Geronimo goes, I personally don't know of any license issues > but I've been meaning to ask on the Geronimo dev list to see if anybody > else has more detailed knowledge (thanks for the nudge). I have > expressed the idea of using Glassfish on the dev list (sans explicit > discussion of the license) and so far there have been no objections. > > If somebody raises an issues I'll post again on this list. > > Thanks for the help, > Joe > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > I'll look into putting something up on the site to that effect. > > > > Any idea if that's a problem for Geronimo Joe? Are you going to be > > able to reuse the CDDL'd Glassfish or is it something that's more > > preferable to have rewritten under AL 2.0? > > > > Hen > > > > On 10/17/06, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Thank you for the prompt response Martin. > >> > >> Joe > >> > >> > >> > >> Martin Cooper wrote: > >> > On 10/17/06, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Is there currently work underway on a Jakarta implementation of the > >> JSTL > >> >> 1.2 spec (JSR 52, JEE5 requirement)? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > There isn't currently, and there isn't likely to be. JSTL > >> development now > >> > happens over in the Glassfish project. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Martin Cooper > >> > > >> > > >> > Assuming there is (or soon will be), does somebody have a > >> guesstimate on > >> > > >> >> when that might be available? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Joe > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >