Re: Are there plans for a Jakarta implementation of the JSTL 1.2 spec
Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.taglibs.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Henri Yandell <flamefew <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Cool - license wise it's a case of us being able to ship the Glassfish > binaries but not the source. I can't see that being a problem in the > Java world - except that it means Geronimo are committting themselves > to something they can't fork later. > > Hen Hi Henri - We would welcome Geronimo using our JSTL implementation, and it is my understanding that Geronimo is already planning to use other GlassFish components, like JAXB. If you find bugs, submit bug reports, or, even better, fixes. Unless the bugs come in a critical time, we will try to fix them; and if the timing is wrong for us, you could do a local fork while we are in high resistence mode and integrate later. Comit rights at GlassFish are acquired in a way similar to at Apache - you need to show competence in the code base. As at Apache you need to sign an agreement to share the copyright (in our case this is the SCA). Documentation on GlassFish is at GlassFishWiki.ORG. As most sites it needs work, but it is good enough for the development team. Hope this helps, - eduard/o ([email protected]; http://blogs.sun.com/theaquarium) === rest of original mail below === > > On 10/31/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn <at> earthlink.net> wrote: > > Thanks Henri ... I think others would find it helpful to have that info > > on the site too. > > > > As far as Geronimo goes, I personally don't know of any license issues > > but I've been meaning to ask on the Geronimo dev list to see if anybody > > else has more detailed knowledge (thanks for the nudge). I have > > expressed the idea of using Glassfish on the dev list (sans explicit > > discussion of the license) and so far there have been no objections. > > > > If somebody raises an issues I'll post again on this list. > > > > Thanks for the help, > > Joe > > > > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > I'll look into putting something up on the site to that effect. > > > > > > Any idea if that's a problem for Geronimo Joe? Are you going to be > > > able to reuse the CDDL'd Glassfish or is it something that's more > > > preferable to have rewritten under AL 2.0? > > > > > > Hen > > > > > > On 10/17/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn <at> earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > > >> Thank you for the prompt response Martin. > > >> > > >> Joe > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Martin Cooper wrote: > > >> > On 10/17/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn <at> earthlink.net> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Is there currently work underway on a Jakarta implementation of the > > >> JSTL > > >> >> 1.2 spec (JSR 52, JEE5 requirement)? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > There isn't currently, and there isn't likely to be. JSTL > > >> development now > > >> > happens over in the Glassfish project. > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Martin Cooper > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Assuming there is (or soon will be), does somebody have a > > >> guesstimate on > > >> > > > >> >> when that might be available? > > >> >> > > >> >> Thanks, > > >> >> Joe >