Re: state of Maven 4 API, extracted from "Re: [Discussion] Is Maven 4.0.0 ready for release?"

Hervé Boutemy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
PR review welcome
https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/1552

On 2026/04/03 08:41:04 Martin Desruisseaux via dev wrote:
> I like this approach. I would have liked to simplify the API using 
> records, more default methods in interfaces, increasing encapsulation 
> (change some public classes and methods to package-private ones), maybe 
> revisit if we really need a separation between interfaces and 
> implementations for everything, etc. But we will obviously not have the 
> time to do that for Maven 4.0.0 if we don't want to delay that release 
> for months or years. The approach described below seems a good 
> compromise to me.
> 
>      Martin
> 
> 
> Le 03/04/2026 à 08:29, Hervé Boutemy a écrit :
> 
> > Copying Guillaume answer here, extracted from the global thread:
> > = https://lists.apache.org/thread/7dmfmy8hlvbtl7xlhfzz1mqwz08j61kw
> >
> > On the @Experimental api, I just want to restate what I had in mind :
> > * release 4.0 without publicizing the new API
> > * finalize 4.x plugins to make them ready for consumption, this could use a
> > few iterations of Maven over the coming months (4.1, 4.2, etc...)
> > * when that's done, remove the @Experimental flag and release all plugins
> > in GA
> > Basically, ship the API in a "tech preview" mode. We don't make the API
> > public, we don't tell people to migrate their plugins yet...
> > But 4.0 brings much more than the API...
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.