Re: Maven 4.0.0 namespace from an XML perspective

Mirko Friedenhagen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]> 

> Am 04.04.2026 um 22:37 schrieb Martin Desruisseaux via dev <[email protected]>:
> Namespaces are not intended to be a way to identify the version. Again, this is similar to Java packages. We don't rename "java.util" to a new name ("java.util.v21", "java.util.v22") every time that a new Java version is released.

I thought the idea of maven 4 was to prepare for faster moves and enabling breaking changes like e.g. one-line-gav definitions possibly with attributes. java.util to my knowledge never broke compatibility while javax/jakarta did so mostly for corporate licensing.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Mirko Friedenhagen
—
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.