Re: [mevenide-user] mveneide is more like an island in netbean ?

On Dec 31, 2007 4:05 PM, Emilian Bold <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hy,
>
> Could you also post a small description of what the netbeans plugin for
> maven did differently from mevenide ?
>
> It seems to me some people coming from Eclise-world are used to add a
> "Java/Python/Maven nature" to some project. For me it's quite clear, a
> project is a project and they rarely cross boundaries. You do get some
> free stuff like Java syntax highlight and compiler due to the
> infrastructure but it's not a surprise to me that wizards needed some
> extra integration work to bridge them to the Maven side.
>
> If what you are suggesting is to somehow keep in sync the build.xml and
> build-impl.xml with the maven side than I'm not sure I would want that.


The netbeans maven plugin (created by Raphael Pieroni afaik) creates a "Ant
project with existing build script" kind of project. If one wants to create
a serious integration, the addition of J2se/web/ear/ejb ant projects is a
must I guess as the ant project with existing build script aka "freeform
project" is actually also quite limited in it's integration with other
features.

Milos


>
>
> Emilian
>
>
> matt weiss wrote:
> > In response to Gary's post, I'd like to take a casual survey. I'm
> > wondering how much momentum there it to resurrect the netbeans plugin
> > for maven?  I've had much luck with the intellij plugin for maven, but
> > was disappointed when I found out that the plugin for netbeans isn't
> > being developed anymore.  I'm guilty of taking more than giving with
> > open source, and this I suppose could be an opportunity for myself to
> > return to the open source community so much that it has given to me.
> >
> > Anyone interested?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On Dec 30, 2007 2:11 AM, garyng <linux-MVPv4nKgfG/[email protected]
> > <mailto:linux-MVPv4nKgfG/[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     Yes, I agree that the netbean plugin is much nicer than the
> >     eclipse one, for
> >     the maven side.
> >
> >     But that is not the point and I did encounter the unwanted
> >     dependencies
> >     issue(which IMO is more like a maven issue, how come after all
> >     these years
> >     people still cannot have these dependency things worked out like
> >     Debian).
> >     But that still doesn't change the fact that I cannot effectively
> >     use what is
> >     in netbean and maven, TOGETHER.
> >
> >     Here is how I use it in eclipse :
> >
> >     1. create dynamic web apps in eclipse(not maven project which just
> >     as you
> >     said is useless or have maven generate the eclipse side, i.e. mvn
> >     eclipse:eclipse) but use the src/main/java, src/main/webapp
> >     instead of the
> >     default one for the paths. and add src/main/resources as the
> addition
> >     source(maven convention for classpath resources like jdbc.properties
> )
> >
> >     2. add maven to this new project(must have the m2eclipse plugin)
> >     3. add maven libraries to the J2EE dependency
> >     4. add dependencies(using the m2eclipse plugin) which would goes
> >     to POM and
> >     is deployed/packaged by eclipse automatically, or manually edit POM.
> >
> >     What I have now is a eclipse project that I can work on as before
> >     but a
> >     layout that I can play with using maven(editing the POM and use
> >     command line
> >     tools for quirks like the mentioned unwanted pulls). Fast test
> >     cycle under
> >     eclipse and the benefit of the command line mvn stuffs for
> >     building/integration testing etc.
> >
> >
> >     Under netbean :
> >
> >     I want to create a web project with all those new shiny
> >     woodstock/facelets
> >     etc. support, everything is nice.
> >
> >     Now how do I add maven to this project ? Impossible.
> >
> >     The other way round, I can create a maven project but where do I
> >     add these
> >     woodstock, facelet, JSF support ? Impossible.
> >
> >     That is why I said it is an island. It integrate well with netbean
> >     the IDE,
> >     but not how I use the IDE.
> >
> >     If there is a way so I can create a netbean web project and add
> >     maven on top
> >     of it(like the above in eclipse), I am more than happy. Otherwise,
> >     it seems
> >     like an 'either/or' situation.
> >
> >     regards,
> >
> >     gary
> >
> >
> >     Cyrill Rüttimann-2 wrote:
> >     >
> >     > Hi,
> >     >
> >     > How did you compare them????
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> >     --
> >     View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/mveneide-is-more-like-an-island-in-netbean---tp14544683p14544893.html
> >     Sent from the mevenide - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> >     <http://Nabble.com>.
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> >
> >        http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Weiss
> > Software Journeyman
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>