Re: [mevenide-user] mveneide is more like an island in netbean ?

On 31 Dec 07, at 6:46 AM 31 Dec 07, matt weiss wrote:

> In response to Gary's post, I'd like to take a casual survey. I'm  
> wondering how much momentum there it to resurrect the netbeans  
> plugin for maven?  I've had much luck with the intellij plugin for  
> maven, but was disappointed when I found out that the plugin for  
> netbeans isn't being developed anymore.  I'm guilty of taking more  
> than giving with open source, and this I suppose could be an  
> opportunity for myself to return to the open source community so  
> much that it has given to me.
>

What do you mean? Milos is working on the Netbeans plugin?

> Anyone interested?
>
> Matt
>
> On Dec 30, 2007 2:11 AM, garyng <linux-MVPv4nKgfG/[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I agree that the netbean plugin is much nicer than the eclipse  
> one, for
> the maven side.
>
> But that is not the point and I did encounter the unwanted  
> dependencies
> issue(which IMO is more like a maven issue, how come after all these  
> years
> people still cannot have these dependency things worked out like  
> Debian).
> But that still doesn't change the fact that I cannot effectively use  
> what is
> in netbean and maven, TOGETHER.
>
> Here is how I use it in eclipse :
>
> 1. create dynamic web apps in eclipse(not maven project which just  
> as you
> said is useless or have maven generate the eclipse side, i.e. mvn
> eclipse:eclipse) but use the src/main/java, src/main/webapp instead  
> of the
> default one for the paths. and add src/main/resources as the addition
> source(maven convention for classpath resources like jdbc.properties)
>
> 2. add maven to this new project(must have the m2eclipse plugin)
> 3. add maven libraries to the J2EE dependency
> 4. add dependencies(using the m2eclipse plugin) which would goes to  
> POM and
> is deployed/packaged by eclipse automatically, or manually edit POM.
>
> What I have now is a eclipse project that I can work on as before  
> but a
> layout that I can play with using maven(editing the POM and use  
> command line
> tools for quirks like the mentioned unwanted pulls). Fast test cycle  
> under
> eclipse and the benefit of the command line mvn stuffs for
> building/integration testing etc.
>
>
> Under netbean :
>
> I want to create a web project with all those new shiny woodstock/ 
> facelets
> etc. support, everything is nice.
>
> Now how do I add maven to this project ? Impossible.
>
> The other way round, I can create a maven project but where do I add  
> these
> woodstock, facelet, JSF support ? Impossible.
>
> That is why I said it is an island. It integrate well with netbean  
> the IDE,
> but not how I use the IDE.
>
> If there is a way so I can create a netbean web project and add  
> maven on top
> of it(like the above in eclipse), I am more than happy. Otherwise,  
> it seems
> like an 'either/or' situation.
>
> regards,
>
> gary
>
>
> Cyrill Rüttimann-2 wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > How did you compare them????
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mveneide-is-more-like-an-island-in-netbean---tp14544683p14544893.html
> Sent from the mevenide - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Matt Weiss
> Software Journeyman
> [email protected]

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------

Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead.

-- Unknown 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email