Re: [Bulk] Re: Scheduled build always say build not required

Eric Minick wrote:

> Interesting. The problem we had seen earlier is that the SVN adapter 
> had been deciding it was time to build too frequently. I believe that 
> was addressed in the most recent build. The approach taken, roughly, 
> is to request a list of changes since the date of the most recent 
> build. The svn client will return too many results due to a subtelty 
> in how it handles revisions. The driver will then filter out any 
> results that appear to have been checked in before the previous build. 
> If there are any revisions remaining, the build will execute.
>
> My first guess would be that the build server and svn server have 
> clocks which are wildly out of sync. Is that possible?
>
> -- Eric
>
> gnugy wrote:
>
>> Hi, I'm am using Anthill with the SubversionRepositoryAdapter.  
>> Whenever my scheduled builds run it tells me that a build is not 
>> required, even when I have two minutes before commited updates to my 
>> repository.  I've been following the list so I know from recent 
>> emails that there is no way to force a scheduled build.  What I am 
>> wondering is how Anthill determines whether or not a build is 
>> necessary.  Perhaps I don't have my repository set up correctly for 
>> Anthill to detect my changes.  Thanks, Philip.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anthill mailing list
>> Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill mailing list
> Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
The two are running on the same machine (I'm writing a program that uses 
Anthill and my test environment is all local).  I should however say 
that I'm not using the latest version of Anthill.  Would updating to the 
newest version possibly help?  If I do have to update how much has 
changed from the previous version to the most recent one?  I am 
reluctant to update because I am worried that the new version won't be 
compatible with my code but if this is the only way to get a scheduled 
build to work I'll have to bite the bullet.  Thanks, Philip.