Re: [Bulk] Re: Scheduled build always say build not required

Unfortunately, most of the recent changes have been pretty minor, so you 
should be pretty safe. You could always set up a seperate installation 
of a newer version and try it out.

-- Eric

gnugy wrote:

> Eric Minick wrote:
>
>> Interesting. The problem we had seen earlier is that the SVN adapter 
>> had been deciding it was time to build too frequently. I believe that 
>> was addressed in the most recent build. The approach taken, roughly, 
>> is to request a list of changes since the date of the most recent 
>> build. The svn client will return too many results due to a subtelty 
>> in how it handles revisions. The driver will then filter out any 
>> results that appear to have been checked in before the previous 
>> build. If there are any revisions remaining, the build will execute.
>>
>> My first guess would be that the build server and svn server have 
>> clocks which are wildly out of sync. Is that possible?
>>
>> -- Eric
>>
>> gnugy wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I'm am using Anthill with the SubversionRepositoryAdapter.  
>>> Whenever my scheduled builds run it tells me that a build is not 
>>> required, even when I have two minutes before commited updates to my 
>>> repository.  I've been following the list so I know from recent 
>>> emails that there is no way to force a scheduled build.  What I am 
>>> wondering is how Anthill determines whether or not a build is 
>>> necessary.  Perhaps I don't have my repository set up correctly for 
>>> Anthill to detect my changes.  Thanks, Philip.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Anthill mailing list
>>> Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anthill mailing list
>> Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>
> The two are running on the same machine (I'm writing a program that 
> uses Anthill and my test environment is all local).  I should however 
> say that I'm not using the latest version of Anthill.  Would updating 
> to the newest version possibly help?  If I do have to update how much 
> has changed from the previous version to the most recent one?  I am 
> reluctant to update because I am worried that the new version won't be 
> compatible with my code but if this is the only way to get a scheduled 
> build to work I'll have to bite the bullet.  Thanks, Philip.
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill mailing list
> Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill