Re: Checkout???

Hi guys,

there is an easy fix for you, all you need to do is edit the getWorkingProject 
pagelet for the repository you are using and if the workDirectory is empty 
use checkout, if not use update. It is a 5 minute change and it probably 
would be the same change that we are going to implement for something like 
that.

Regards,
Varban

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:15, Andy Levy wrote:
> On 5/16/06, Marcio Ribeiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks Andy
> >
> >
> > On 5/16/06, Andy Levy <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  On 5/16/06, Marcio Ribeiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I noticed that anthill(OS) uses checkout instead of update when
> >
> > building...
> >
> > > I'm using subversion and i think the checkout should be done just in
> > > the first time. When you already have checked out, just an update would
> > > be fine...  What do you think???
> >
> > I think I asked this a few months ago, coming from the same train of
> > thought you're on right now.
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.anthill/3185
>
> Probably wasn't the answer you were hoping for.
>
> The idea makes sense to me now, it's more a matter of setting
> expectations appropriately.  I'm not in a "we have to roll out new
> builds in under 30 seconds" situation, so it's not a big deal to us
> that the checkout & build take a little longer - we just fire off the
> task and wait for the email to appear indicating the results.
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill mailing list
> Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill