RE: AWare
Jérôme BERNARD <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Jonas Boner <[email protected]>: > Hi Jerome. > > Some thoughts: > > 1. Housing > > I would like the project to be completely community driven. Meaning that > anyone that has something to contribute and is willing to meet the > requirements in terms of reusability, value, tests, documentation, etc. > should be allowed to become a contributor. This implies that it the committer > base can be unlimited and such a project is not well suited at Codehaus which > is not an "open community" in this sense. So I think that sf.net or java.net > is a better place for AWare. > Which one is preferable? I would go for java.net instead of sf.net. Lot of sf.net projects (like WebWork) moved to java.net because of sf.net problems in terms of quality of service at least. Should I (or you or Alex) apply for a new project on java.net? > 2. Documentation > > I have been doing some thinking after reading Mik experiences. We want it to > be easy for anyone to contribute. I looked some more at Confluence and it > supports exporting the site or individual pages to HTML and PDF. Would this > not be best choice? Ok. I did not know Coherence well as I said earlier. If Coherence is able to do such a thing, there let's use Coherence :-) Jérôme.