RE: AWare

Jérôme BERNARD <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting Jonas Boner <[email protected]>:

> Hi Jerome.
> 
> Some thoughts:
> 
> 1. Housing
> 
> I would like the project to be completely community driven. Meaning that
> anyone that has something to contribute and is willing to meet the
> requirements in terms of reusability, value, tests, documentation, etc.
> should be allowed to become a contributor. This implies that it the committer
> base can be unlimited and such a project is not well suited at Codehaus which
> is not an "open community" in this sense. So I think that sf.net or java.net
> is a better place for AWare. 
> Which one is preferable?

I would go for java.net instead of sf.net.
Lot of sf.net projects (like WebWork) moved to java.net because of sf.net
problems in terms of quality of service at least.
Should I (or you or Alex) apply for a new project on java.net?

> 2. Documentation
> 
> I have been doing some thinking after reading Mik experiences. We want it to
> be easy for anyone to contribute. I looked some more at Confluence and it
> supports exporting the site or individual pages to HTML and PDF. Would this
> not be best choice?

Ok. I did not know Coherence well as I said earlier. If Coherence is able to do
such a thing, there let's use Coherence :-)


Jérôme.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.