RE: AWare

> 
> I would go for java.net instead of sf.net.
> Lot of sf.net projects (like WebWork) moved to java.net 
> because of sf.net problems in terms of quality of service at least.
> Should I (or you or Alex) apply for a new project on java.net?

Great, let's go for java.net. 
Please apply if you want to, otherwise I can do it.
Add you, me and Alex as admins.

> 
> > 2. Documentation
> > 
> > I have been doing some thinking after reading Mik 
> experiences. We want 
> > it to be easy for anyone to contribute. I looked some more at 
> > Confluence and it supports exporting the site or individual 
> pages to 
> > HTML and PDF. Would this not be best choice?
> 
> Ok. I did not know Coherence well as I said earlier. If 
> Coherence is able to do such a thing, there let's use Coherence :-)

I have not used coherence much, but I have heard that it is great, the PicoContainer guys are happy with it as documentation format, and it is simple. Then we have reached consensus.

/Jonas

> 
> 
> Jérôme.
>