RE: [aspectwerkz-user] A couple of questions
"AVERY, Neil, FM" <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:35:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DDCC15E558B3F142A8F72A157FBB63BE144A6C83@lon0348xns.fm.rbsgrp.net> |
Thanks for the reply Alex, We are using AW2.0 We don't mind trying CVS head but if there is no official release due then we may be better spending time migrating to AJ5.. is M4 yet feature complete (Im not sure if that's what you mean in ur reply)? When is AJ5 final scheduled for release? -neil. -----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 14 October 2005 16:22 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-user] A couple of questions Hi As you know we merged AspectWerkz technology with AspectJ to produce "AspectJ 5". This explains the low activity after we shipped the fairly stable AW 2.0. AspectJ 5 is in M4 state, and we will do one RC1 more before it gets final, beeing feature complete with what AspectWerkz syntax brings. I 'll write a tech. paper to deeply describe the delta / migration path in this timeline as well. That said, which version of AW are you using? Is it 2.0 or chs head. CVS head has changed a lot since 2.0 as I'have been f.e. doing ASM 2.0 upgrade, backport175 integration, and rearchitected the AspectOf and MixinOf backend - which indeed as been a weakness so far. As I did not had time (working on AspectJ 5 integration) and as noone really asked for I never shipped an official AW 2.1. I can certainly spend time in a fix for you but : - what are the chance for you to migrate to AJ 5 final ? - can you provide me a test case that spot a problem for AW 2.0 (assuming you are using it) - can you try with AW-latest by building cvs head ? If the bug is not there anymore, are you comfortable with using that version? - can you find a workaround instead? As you understand, unless there is a high demand for a AW 2.1 I will certainly encourage everyone to migrate to AspectJ 5 - especially when it will be final. Alex On 10/14/05, AVERY, Neil, FM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > When is the next release of Aspectwerkz? > Is Aspectwerkz still being actively developed as nothing has happened > for the last couple of months. > > Ive also found two problems when using aspectwerkz: > 1. Using Aspects.aspectOf(MyAspect.class, targetInstance) will always > return a MyAspect.class instance when one is not bound to > targetInstance. > > 2. When using java 5 annotations and trying to bind multiple aspects > to the same key, only one is ever actually bound (perInstance). This > is confirmed when you browse the object instance and can view the > instanceAspects hashmap. If you remove the aspect definition which > does get bound, then the one which seems to have been hidden will > successfully bind. > > an example configuration follows: > <aspect class="org.stuff.RemoteMarshaller" > deployment-model="perInstance" container="org.neo.swarm.aop.AWerkzAOPFactory"> > <pointcut name="poitcutA">execution(* *..*(..)) AND > within(@org.neo.swarm.SomeAnnotation *)</pointcut> > <advice name="remote" type="around" bind-to="pointcutA" /> > </aspect> <aspect class="org.stuff.ClusteredHandler" > deployment-model="perInstance" > container="org.neo.swarm.aop.AWerkzAOPFactory"> > <pointcut name="pointcutB">execution(* *..*(..)) AND > within(@org.neo.swarm.SomeAnnotation *)</pointcut> > <advice name="remote" type="around" bind-to="pointcutB" /> > </aspect> > > Any help gratefully appreciated, > Regards Neil. > > > > ********************************************************************** > ************* > The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered > Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. > Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority > > This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee > only. If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, > please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then > delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not > necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept > responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. > > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission > of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that > the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any > attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No > responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this > regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks > as it considers appropriate. Visit our websites at: > http://www.rbs.co.uk/CBFM > http://www.rbsmarkets.com > **************************************************************************** **** > *********************************************************************************** The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. Visit our websites at: http://www.rbs.co.uk/CBFM http://www.rbsmarkets.com ********************************************************************************