Re: [aspectwerkz-user] A couple of questions
Alexandre Vasseur <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:13:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Here is a note for what I mean on AspectJ 5 feature completion. I am assuming that as AW user what you want is - offline compilation - online / load time weaving mode - aop.xml files for load time weaving, not required to run with Java 5 - aspects in plain java files, not required to run with Java 5 Right now AspectJ 5 M4 as all that except: - be able to define pointcut in XML (instead of aspect class) - mixin support So I mean that we are just close to finish all that. We will then do a RC1 with that things that -if you want - you should definitely try before we ship the final version. I hope to see RC1 within a month and final before christmas - as we intended to achieve. So the last step in this process is to evangelize what we have done ie clearly write from an AW user perspective what that means and what to do / where to start / what to concentrate on. So far there is only raw documentation about what AspectJ 5 is, how load time weaving is configured and such - available on aspectj.org "AspectJ 5 developer book". A good starting point but not really hands on. Alex On 10/14/05, AVERY, Neil, FM <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply Alex, > > We are using AW2.0 > > We don't mind trying CVS head but if there is no official release due then > we may be better spending time migrating to AJ5.. > is M4 yet feature complete (Im not sure if that's what you mean in ur > reply)? > > When is AJ5 final scheduled for release? > > -neil. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 14 October 2005 16:22 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-user] A couple of questions > > > Hi > > As you know we merged AspectWerkz technology with AspectJ to produce > "AspectJ 5". This explains the low activity after we shipped the fairly > stable AW 2.0. > > AspectJ 5 is in M4 state, and we will do one RC1 more before it gets final, > beeing feature complete with what AspectWerkz syntax brings. I 'll write a > tech. paper to deeply describe the delta / migration path in this timeline > as well. > > That said, which version of AW are you using? Is it 2.0 or chs head. CVS > head has changed a lot since 2.0 as I'have been f.e. doing ASM 2.0 upgrade, > backport175 integration, and rearchitected the AspectOf and MixinOf backend > - which indeed as been a weakness so far. As I did not had time (working on > AspectJ 5 integration) and as noone really asked for I never shipped an > official AW 2.1. > > I can certainly spend time in a fix for you but : > - what are the chance for you to migrate to AJ 5 final ? > - can you provide me a test case that spot a problem for AW 2.0 (assuming > you are using it) > - can you try with AW-latest by building cvs head ? If the bug is not there > anymore, are you comfortable with using that version? > - can you find a workaround instead? > > As you understand, unless there is a high demand for a AW 2.1 I will > certainly encourage everyone to migrate to AspectJ 5 - especially when it > will be final. Alex > > > > On 10/14/05, AVERY, Neil, FM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > When is the next release of Aspectwerkz? > > Is Aspectwerkz still being actively developed as nothing has happened > > for the last couple of months. > > > > Ive also found two problems when using aspectwerkz: > > 1. Using Aspects.aspectOf(MyAspect.class, targetInstance) will always > > return a MyAspect.class instance when one is not bound to > > targetInstance. > > > > 2. When using java 5 annotations and trying to bind multiple aspects > > to the same key, only one is ever actually bound (perInstance). This > > is confirmed when you browse the object instance and can view the > > instanceAspects hashmap. If you remove the aspect definition which > > does get bound, then the one which seems to have been hidden will > > successfully bind. > > > > an example configuration follows: > > <aspect class="org.stuff.RemoteMarshaller" > > deployment-model="perInstance" > container="org.neo.swarm.aop.AWerkzAOPFactory"> > > <pointcut name="poitcutA">execution(* *..*(..)) AND > > within(@org.neo.swarm.SomeAnnotation *)</pointcut> > > <advice name="remote" type="around" bind-to="pointcutA" /> > > </aspect> <aspect class="org.stuff.ClusteredHandler" > > deployment-model="perInstance" > > container="org.neo.swarm.aop.AWerkzAOPFactory"> > > <pointcut name="pointcutB">execution(* *..*(..)) AND > > within(@org.neo.swarm.SomeAnnotation *)</pointcut> > > <advice name="remote" type="around" bind-to="pointcutB" /> > > </aspect> > > > > Any help gratefully appreciated, > > Regards Neil. > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > ************* > > The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. > Registered > > Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. > > Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority > > > > This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee > > only. If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, > > please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then > > delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not > > necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept > > responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. > > > > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission > > of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that > > the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any > > attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No > > responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this > > regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks > > as it considers appropriate. Visit our websites at: > > http://www.rbs.co.uk/CBFM > > http://www.rbsmarkets.com > > > **************************************************************************** > **** > > > > > *********************************************************************************** > The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. > Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority > > This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the > addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other > than the addressee, please return the message to the sender > by replying to it and then delete the message from your > computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The > Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for > changes made to this message after it was sent. > > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the > transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to > ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this > message and any attachments will not adversely affect its > systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal > Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry > out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. > Visit our websites at: > http://www.rbs.co.uk/CBFM > http://www.rbsmarkets.com > ******************************************************************************** > >