Re: [aspectwerkz-user] Aspectwerks / AspectJ

Hi Jonas,
can you elaborate on that please. Is there any dynamic ability in AspectJ
currently, or is it planned as part of the integration?

On 4/21/06, Jonas Bonér <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Go for AspectJ unless you have some requirements for dynamic AOP (e.g.
> redefinition of the system at runtime), if so: AspectWerkz.
>
>
> On 4/20/06, Santiago Aguiar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I've read that aspectwerkz and aspectj were joining forces to work in a
> > single project. This means that one of the two projects will become the main
> > project? (even if both are maintained) If starting a new project, which one
> > would be the best option? AspectJ?
> >
> > Thanks!!!
> >
> >   santiago aguiar
> > *netlabs* *Palmar 2548*
> > *Montevideo, Uruguay *
> > *Tel. +(598 2) 707 7687 *
> > *Fax. +(598 2) 709 4866*
> > *http://www.netlabs.com.uy*
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jonas Bonér
> Terracotta, Inc.
>
> http://jonasboner.com
> http://www.terracottatech.com
>