Re: [aspectwerkz-user] Aspectwerks / AspectJ

Hi
Roughly there is NO hot deployment of aspects in AspectJ and this is not
planned at all.
Instead, you need to mimic that in AspectJ using an if(activated) pointcut,
and some "activate() / deactivate()" method for example.

You might also consider
- pointcut expression are more rich in AspectJ (but sometime can be more
complex - especially when using generics in Java 5)
- Eclipse integration is way more mature for AspectJ (check AJDT)

Alex

On 4/27/06, Colin Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jonas,
> can you elaborate on that please. Is there any dynamic ability in AspectJ
> currently, or is it planned as part of the integration?
>
>
> On 4/21/06, Jonas Bonér <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Go for AspectJ unless you have some requirements for dynamic AOP (e.g.
> > redefinition of the system at runtime), if so: AspectWerkz.
> >
> >
> > On 4/20/06, Santiago Aguiar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >  I've read that aspectwerkz and aspectj were joining forces to work in
> > > a single project. This means that one of the two projects will become the
> > > main project? (even if both are maintained) If starting a new project, which
> > > one would be the best option? AspectJ?
> > >
> > > Thanks!!!
> > >
> > >   santiago aguiar
> > > *netlabs* *Palmar 2548*
> > > *Montevideo, Uruguay *
> > > *Tel. +(598 2) 707 7687 *
> > > *Fax. +(598 2) 709 4866*
> > > *http://www.netlabs.com.uy*
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jonas Bonér
> > Terracotta, Inc.
> >
> > http://jonasboner.com
> > http://www.terracottatech.com
> >
>
>