RE: Some thoughts on future directions for Bean Shell

 Hello All,
 
   did you ever look at NetRexx for easier Java programming?
   or will we stuck with old C-like syntax and sematics forever??
 kind regards. Tom. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Slava Pestov
To: beanshell-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org;
beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Sent: 22.04.2004 02:11
Subject: [Beanshell-users] Some thoughts on future directions for BeanShell

Hi everybody,

I have some thoughts I wanted to share, and get feedback on.

- I'll mostly be contributing bug fixes and performance enhancements.

- Is JDK 1.1 compatibility still important? I think it could simplify
the code a little to not have to maintain it.

- I don't want BeanShell to become too big or complex; I'd prefer it to
stick to Java syntax and sematics as closely as possible.

- I'd like to merge a few changes from the jEdit BeanShell; I'll post
patches tomorrow for review.

-- 
Slava Pestov


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Beanshell-users mailing list
Beanshell-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-users


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click