Re: RE: [Beanshell-dev] Some thoughts on future directions for BeanShell

Or just make 2.0b1 -> 2.0 final, since it works pretty darn well!  Then 
Just start on BeanShell 3.0....

BeanShell 2.0-, Java 1.1
BeanShell 3.0+, Java 1.3

Werner Randelshofer escribió:
> Please don't purge BeanShell 2.0b1 for Java 1.1. It is working perfectly
> well.
> 
> How about renaming 2.0b1 to 1.4 and keeping it on CVS, as a 'legacy
> technology branch' of BeanShell?
> Just keep it there for the few who still need support for Java 1.1 (like
> me). And if someone is willing to spend time on it, to keep the BeanShell
> language at this branch at par with an upcoming 2.x version, let him/her
> have a go at it.
> 
> BeanShell 1.4-, Java 1.1
> BeanShell 2.0+, Java 1.3
> 
> 
> -Werner
> 
> 
> Pat wrote:
> 
>>[...]
>>What do you think?
>>
>>BeanShell 1.3-, Java 1.1
>>BeanShell 2.0+, Java 1.3
>>[...] 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Beanshell-developers mailing list
> Beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-developers




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click