Re: [Beanshell-users] RE: Some thoughts on future directions for BeanShell

Werner Randelshofer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel,gmane.comp.java.beanshell.user
Message-ID <BCAD21B7.9B49%[email protected]>
Please don't purge BeanShell 2.0b1 for Java 1.1. It is working perfectly
well.

How about renaming 2.0b1 to 1.4 and keeping it on CVS, as a 'legacy
technology branch' of BeanShell?
Just keep it there for the few who still need support for Java 1.1 (like
me). And if someone is willing to spend time on it, to keep the BeanShell
language at this branch at par with an upcoming 2.x version, let him/her
have a go at it.

BeanShell 1.4-, Java 1.1
BeanShell 2.0+, Java 1.3


-Werner


Pat wrote:
> [...]
> What do you think?
> 
> BeanShell 1.3-, Java 1.1
> BeanShell 2.0+, Java 1.3
> [...] 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.