Re: [Beanshell-users] RE: Some thoughts on future directions for BeanShell
Werner Randelshofer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel,gmane.comp.java.beanshell.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BCAD21B7.9B49%[email protected]> |
Please don't purge BeanShell 2.0b1 for Java 1.1. It is working perfectly well. How about renaming 2.0b1 to 1.4 and keeping it on CVS, as a 'legacy technology branch' of BeanShell? Just keep it there for the few who still need support for Java 1.1 (like me). And if someone is willing to spend time on it, to keep the BeanShell language at this branch at par with an upcoming 2.x version, let him/her have a go at it. BeanShell 1.4-, Java 1.1 BeanShell 2.0+, Java 1.3 -Werner Pat wrote: > [...] > What do you think? > > BeanShell 1.3-, Java 1.1 > BeanShell 2.0+, Java 1.3 > [...] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click