Re: BeanShell alternatives (was Re: Status ofprojectand adding 1.5 generics)
"Toomas Römer" <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:25:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi I'm very glad that such a discussion is taking place. The company I work for also uses BSH in its products for scripting support and we're not very happy that we cannot commit patches nor get patches for current bugs. >From the thread I can say that the fschmidt bsh2 fork is a bit too scary for us. The approach of everybody getting their stuff in is too experimental. We're looking for more of a maintenance mode with bugfixes and only features that would have Java compatibility in mind. We're also interested in compiling for Java 1.4 as long as possible. I guess our wishes are the closest to David's ones. So if there would be a stability branch we could definitely support it with bug fixes, testing, code-reviews etc. Toomas On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David A. Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've been monitoring this list for a long time, and the lack of >> traffic is pretty damning. It seems like it will take a lot of work >> and evangelizing to get sufficient interest to keep BeanShell going >> for the long run. > > I for one would volunteer some time maintaining a branch who's primary goal > was stability, > key bug fixes, limiting arbitrary changes, and fully QA testing and who had > some kind of shared vision along that goal. > > Branches who's intent is adding lots of features and open to anyone > submitting code are intresting in thieir own way, but not the branch I'd be > willing to invest much effort in besides passivly watching and seeing where > it goes. > > But yes ... this has come up before and hasnt gone anwhere yet. > > My "New Years Wish" is that Pat would officially write and say he's done > with BeanShell. He's done a fantastic job, and given the "community" a > great present. But as long as he doesnt officially come out and say he's > done, > I really doubt there'll be enough initiative for anyone or group to take it > over. Even better if he would "officially" apoint a group to take it over. > I'm sure we'd find enough volunteers that to take on that task if it was > sactioned. > > > > -David > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > David A. Lee > [email protected] > http://www.calldei.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Beanshell-developers mailing list > Beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------