Re: BeanShell alternatives (was Re: Status ofprojectand adding 1.5 generics)

"Toomas Römer" <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:25:31 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi

I'm very glad that such a discussion is taking place. The company I
work for also uses BSH in its products for scripting support and we're
not very happy that we cannot commit patches nor get patches for
current bugs.

>From the thread I can say that the fschmidt bsh2 fork is a bit too
scary for us. The approach of everybody getting their stuff in is too
experimental. We're looking for more of a maintenance mode with
bugfixes and only features that would have Java compatibility in mind.
We're also interested in compiling for Java 1.4 as long as possible. I
guess our wishes are the closest to David's ones.

So if there would be a stability branch we could definitely support it
with bug fixes, testing, code-reviews etc.

Toomas

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David A. Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've been monitoring this list for a long time, and the lack of
>> traffic is pretty damning. It seems like it will take a lot of work
>> and evangelizing to get sufficient interest to keep BeanShell going
>> for the long run.
>
> I for one would volunteer some time maintaining a branch who's primary goal
> was stability,
> key bug fixes, limiting arbitrary changes, and fully QA testing and who had
> some kind of shared vision along that goal.
>
> Branches who's intent is adding lots of features and open to anyone
> submitting code are intresting in thieir own way, but not the branch I'd be
> willing to invest much effort in besides passivly watching and seeing where
> it goes.
>
> But yes ... this has come up before and hasnt gone anwhere yet.
>
> My "New Years Wish" is that Pat would officially write and say he's done
> with BeanShell.   He's done a fantastic job, and given the "community" a
> great present.  But as long as he doesnt officially come out and say he's
> done,
> I really doubt there'll be enough initiative for anyone or group to take it
> over.  Even better if he would "officially" apoint a group to take it over.
> I'm sure we'd find enough volunteers that to take on that task if it was
> sactioned.
>
>
>
> -David
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> David A. Lee
> [email protected]
> http://www.calldei.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Beanshell-developers mailing list
> Beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-developers
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------