Re: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:29:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABDcavY8oskPwJFtV8QnE+Q5AT2sWUqi+E+hseoWW9tTZE90pw@mail.gmail.com> |
--001a11c1fe1e0d03750502440dd5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> escribi=C3=B3: > El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> escribi=C3=B3: > >> No, it's really not unfair at all. You are basically saying Andrew is > >> doing a crappy job as a maintainer > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > No, I am definitely NOT saying that, nothing even close. Please don't p= ut > > your words in my mouth, thank you. > > Of course you are saying that. No, I am not. > Why else would you even bring up the > issue of finding a "competent successor" which implies that Andrew is > no longer interested in GNU Classpath and neglecting its maintenance? Wrong. I said that if the current maintainers don't have time or resources, perhaps they could look for a competent successor. One that they trust. That does not imply that the current maintainers are not competent. That might have been your interpretation, but it is not what I think and it is not what I said. (By the way, when I said "competent successor" I was just quoting Eric S Raymond, literally. I even linked to the source.) > El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> escribi=C3=B3: > >> Once you answer the hypothetical question *who* should > >> be the successor, you will understand why. > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I see, so if I don't have the answer, the question makes no sense. Ok. > > You didn't even try to answer the question, did you? No. I don't have the answer, and I don't think that having an answer is a prerequisite for a question to be valid. > > If Andrew actually needed a "competent successor" (he doesn't), If he doesn't, then all the better. I am not trying to annoy anyone, just trying to help. At least this ignited a discussion. That's already something. Guillermo --=20 Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia [email protected] --001a11c1fe1e0d03750502440dd5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <br><br>El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <<a href=3D"mai= lto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> escribi=C3=B3:<br><block= quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc= solid;padding-left:1ex"> El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <<a href=3D"javascript:= ;" onclick=3D"_e(event, 'cvml', '[email protected]')">penb= [email protected]</a>> escribi=C3=B3:<br> >> No, it's really not unfair at all. You are basically saying An= drew is<br> >> doing a crappy job as a maintainer<br> <br> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia<br> <<a href=3D"javascript:;" onclick=3D"_e(event, 'cvml', 'guil= [email protected]')">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> > No, I am definitely NOT saying that, nothing even close. Please don= 9;t put<br> > your words in my mouth, thank you.<br> <br> Of course you are saying that.=C2=A0</blockquote><blockquote class=3D"gmail= _quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:= 1ex"></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No, I am not.=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0<= /div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-le= ft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Why else would you even bring up the<br> issue of finding a "competent successor" which implies that Andre= w is<br> no longer interested in GNU Classpath and neglecting its maintenance?</bloc= kquote><div><br></div><div>Wrong. I said that if the current maintainers do= n't have time or resources, perhaps they could look for a competent suc= cessor. One that they trust. That does not=C2=A0imply that the current main= tainers are=C2=A0not competent. That might have been your interpretation, b= ut it=C2=A0is not what I think and it is not what I said.=C2=A0</div> <div><br></div><div>(By the way, when I said "competent successor"= ; I was just quoting Eric S Raymond, literally. I even linked to the source= .)</div><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo= rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br> El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <<a href=3D"javascript:= ;" onclick=3D"_e(event, 'cvml', '[email protected]')">penb= [email protected]</a>> escribi=C3=B3:<br> >> Once you answer the hypothetical question *who* should<br> >> be the successor, you will understand why.<br> <br> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia<br> <<a href=3D"javascript:;" onclick=3D"_e(event, 'cvml', 'guil= [email protected]')">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> > I see, so if I don't have the answer, the question makes no sense.= Ok.<br> <br> You didn't even try to answer the question, did you?</blockquote><div><= br></div><div>No. I don't have the answer, and I don't think that h= aving an answer is a prerequisite for a question to be valid.=C2=A0</div><d= iv> =C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo= rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br> If Andrew actually needed a "competent successor" (he doesn't= ),=C2=A0</blockquote><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 = 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><div><br><= /div> <div>If he doesn't, then all the better. I am not trying to annoy anyon= e, just trying to help.</div><br><div>At least this ignited a discussion. T= hat's already something.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Guillermo<span>= </span></div> <br><br>-- <br>Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia<br><a href=3D"mailto:guille.rodri= [email protected]">[email protected]</a><br> --001a11c1fe1e0d03750502440dd5--