Re: Has the opensource version of CC been left to die on the vine?
"Buehler.Steven" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.cruise-control.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <565732B8B847B74DAB8C3C28421AB1AD154042AC84@RNOMBX01.is.ad.igt.com> |
"do away with CC here"? Do you mean this mailing list or elsewhere? What do you mean by "Cruise" and "CC"? I wasn't aware CruiseControl was now a commercial product? What features are missing that you must have? From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Cruisecontrol-user] Has the opensource version of CC been left to die on the vine? I'm leading an initiative to do away with CC here for a few reasons and as part of this process, I've been tasked with reviewing any/all open source/closed source CI servers. But I'm quite nostalgic - why doesn't the free version of CC feature some of the things other free CI servers offer? Where's the trickle down effect from "Cruise" to "CC"? Any ideas? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Cruisecontrol-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cruisecontrol-user