Re: Has the opensource version of CCbeenleftto die on the vine?

For build trend charting - I'd bypass all the sop maven reports and just
us sonar.
 
200% better.

________________________________

From: Jeffrey Fredrick [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 12:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Cruisecontrol-user] Has the opensource version of
CCbeenleftto die on the vine?


Hello Rajib, 

a couple of examples would be the ability to configure projects via the
GUI or the richness of the built in trend charts.

Jtf


On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Rajib Basu <[email protected]> wrote:


	Hi EJ Ciramella,

	 

	What do you mean by "Look at bamboo or hudson - they're light
years beyond what either version of CC offers"?

	 

	Please explain since currently we are using cruisecrontrol (
free one) and can do all of the things needed.

	 

	Thanks for the help

	Rajib

	 

	 

	
________________________________


	From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:52 PM 

	To: [email protected]
	Subject: Re: [Cruisecontrol-user] Has the opensource version of
CC beenleftto die on the vine?

	

	 

	In case you missed it - 

	 

	Here's the free version - http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/

	Here's the pay version -
http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration

	 

	Looks like (to me) "cruisecontrol" has been abandoned.

	 

	
________________________________


	From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:15 PM
	To: [email protected]
	Subject: Re: [Cruisecontrol-user] Has the opensource version of
CC been leftto die on the vine?

	Yeah, so there's the "cruise" official pay-per-use product and
the opensource (free) version of cruise control.

	 

	What features am I missing?  Look at bamboo or hudson - they're
light years beyond what either version of CC offers.

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Buehler.Steven [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:22 PM
	To: [email protected]
	Subject: Re: [Cruisecontrol-user] Has the opensource version of
CC been left to die on the vine?

	"do away with CC here"?  Do you mean this mailing list or
elsewhere?

	 

	What do you mean by "Cruise" and "CC"?  I wasn't aware
CruiseControl was now a commercial product?

	 

	What features are missing that you must have?

	 

	From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:16 PM
	To: [email protected]
	Subject: [Cruisecontrol-user] Has the opensource version of CC
been left to die on the vine?

	 

	I'm leading an initiative to do away with CC here for a few
reasons and as part of this process, I've been tasked with reviewing
any/all open source/closed source CI servers.

	 

	But I'm quite nostalgic - why doesn't the free version of CC
feature some of the things other free CI servers offer?

	 

	Where's the trickle down effect from "Cruise" to "CC"?

	 

	Any ideas?



-- 
Build engineer training: http://ci-guys.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects

_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrol-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cruisecontrol-user