Re: Barracuda and DODS (again)

Jacob Kjome <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Did you see the post by Alfred Madl on this topic?
http://barracudamvc.org/lists/archives/barracuda/2003-November/007065.html

Being that Enhyda 5.1 is around now, maybe BarracudaDiscRack needs an 
update.  The build could include the necessary libraries from Enhydra 5.1 
to allow it to run under Tomcat and generate the DODS stuff using an Ant 
task (assuming one exists).

If you would like to take up that effort, we would certainly welcome the 
changes and get it into an official Barracuda distribution.  Knowing very 
little about Enhyda 5.1 or DODS, though, I will not be up to the task of 
the upgrade.

Jake

At 12:26 PM 11/27/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>Sometime ago I tell about problems with Barracuda and DODS 5.1
>There are compilations problems you can avoid using other jars from
>the enhydra 5.1 distro. But you also get runtime problems (for me, 
>unavoidables
>from the time being).
>
>Some in this list recommended using DODS 5.0, but I can´t find this version
>of DODS :(
>
>Furthermore, I think quite troublesome if when wanting to use DODS, we get in
>incompatibilities.
>
>The BarracudaDiscrack 1.2.5 compiles an run well out of the box, but if yo
>try to replace de "data" code with newly generated DODS 5.1 code, it fails 
>here
>and then.
>
>I would like if there si some stable aproach to this problem, or if there 
>are some
>subsitute of DODS that we can use safely.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Best regards,
>Juan R. Migoya
>SPAIN
>
>_______________________________________________
>Barracuda mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.