Re: Re: Re: Re: AW: License proposal (Summary)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> My question is not about the name, but about the
> integrity you talked bout. My question assumed that
> someone may only use part of the Barracuda, such as
> the event part. So other components can be removed
> from Barracuda package. It is reasonable to do that,
> but that may effect the integrity you talked about.

INHO thats more a technical than a legal issue - nobody can force you to use 
certain aspects of a library. And if the components are orthogonal and thus 
separable, you can split the lib into parts. Think of a static linked binary 
made with C - the linker will only incorporate the code related to the 
actually used symbols - not more. Regardless of what license the lib has.

Barracuda has quite suceeded in beeing orthogonal for the main parts - 
however, the saved few hundered kbs of jarred code aren't worth the hassle in 
times where desktop machines are shipped with half a gig of mem. 


Diez
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAAUfHBUNnEs5xWG4RArxxAJ0bT0J/RkD0r9Yhf2VVJCmyAeFcvwCfeydp
sfO8WKPKw+vB91IHJWinJIs=
=EkRr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----