RE: Re: Re: AW: License proposal (Summary)
Xue-Feng Yang <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:26:02 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Christian Cryder <[email protected]> wrote: > > So if someone is only interested in the event > model > > part, he/she must import the other part for > his/her > > projects? > > From an _architecture_ perspective, the answer is > clearly NO - Barracuda is > designed in layers so that you pick and choose what > you want to use. If you > just want the event model, you can go for it. > > I raised the question about LGPL licensing - if you > extend Barracuda event > classes (which is how Barracuda is designed to be > used), does the LGPL then > require the app doing the extending to be LGPL (ie. > is the app using the > event model a "derivative work"). To me, the LGPL is > fuzzy in this area, and > its that fuzziness that concerns me. > > Please feel free to holler if you have further > questions or comments... > What you said about LGPL is exactly what I tried to ask in the above message. Thanks, I will follow the discussion on this issue. Xue-Feng ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca