Re: Re: Re: Re: AW: License proposal (Summary)

 --- Thorsten_M?r <[email protected]> wrote: >
Xue-Feng Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >> equal to BSD. Second it
> >> addresses another aspect which I neither found in
> >> BSD nor LGPL (correct me
> >> if I'm wrong): The licence would protect the
> >> integrity and use of the name
> >> Barracuda.
> >
> > So if someone is only interested in the event
> model
> > part, he/she must import the other part for
> his/her
> > projects?
> No. But one must only say that "This product
> includes software developed by
> ...".  But how does your question relate to the
> protection of the name? I'm
> a bit confused. I recommend to read the licence, it
> is really very short and
> easy to understand:
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE
> But mentally substitute every occourence of Apache
> with whatever you want,
> for instance Barracuda ;-)

My question is not about the name, but about the
integrity you talked bout. My question assumed that
someone may only use part of the Barracuda, such as
the event part. So other components can be removed
from Barracuda package. It is reasonable to do that,
but that may effect the integrity you talked about.

Xue-Feng

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca