Re[4]: is the cvs source actually current? worried!
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Springfield Nuclear Plant |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Christian, Will do. Jake Monday, January 20, 2003, 11:23:18 AM, you wrote: CC> Hi Jake, CC> Why don't you just forward each of them to me, going back 6 weeks and 1 CC> day...there shouldn't actually be very many, since the freeze date must have CC> been fairly close to that. My thinking here is that are probably only a CC> handful of files that changed on b.e.org prior to the freeze date... CC> I don't have a tool to do a directory wide diffs...maybe Shawn does... CC> Christian CC> ---------------------------------------------- CC> Christian Cryder [[email protected]] CC> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com CC> Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org CC> ---------------------------------------------- CC> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome >> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:05 AM >> To: Christian Cryder >> Subject: Re[2]: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually current? worried! >> >> >> Hi Christian, >> >> I think I have pretty much every barracuda-commit message from b.e.org >> for the last year or so. It is all in Eudora at home so I won't be >> able to do anything about this until this evening. What format would >> you like them exported to? I'm not sure about all the export formats >> Eudora supports, but if I know in advance what would be useful to you >> and I find that Eudora supports it, then I can send it to in you your >> preferred format. >> >> That said, I think that maybe a directory comparison might work >> better here than >> fishing through all the barracuda-commit emails. ExamDiffPro on Win32 >> supports this quite nicely, but my trial ran out and it won't allow me >> to do recursive directory comparisons so it would kind of tedious to >> use until I get a license. >> >> These things happen. I'm certainly disappointed, but we'll recover >> :-) >> >> Jake >> >> Monday, January 20, 2003, 9:22:51 AM, you wrote: >> >> CC> Crap. Looks like the barracuda-commit list has never been archived on >> CC> b.e.org, so there's no way to go back and find out exactly what was >> CC> committed...and I just cleaned out that mail folder last week >> on my machine >> CC> here. So...does anyone who is subscribed to the b.e.org >> commit list have >> CC> those messages archived on their box? If so, could you email >> them to me and >> CC> Jake? That would give us a list of things to check at least... >> >> CC> At this point, I think our best bet is to try and figure out where the >> CC> discrepencies are and to manually roll them forward. >> >> CC> grrr...sorry about this Jake...I thought we had that base >> covered. I'm just >> CC> glad you noticed it when you did... >> >> CC> Christian >> CC> ---------------------------------------------- >> CC> Christian Cryder [[email protected]] >> CC> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com >> CC> Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org >> CC> ---------------------------------------------- >> CC> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" >> CC> -----Original Message----- >> CC> From: [email protected] >> CC> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome >> CC> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:12 PM >> CC> To: [email protected] >> CC> Subject: RE: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually >> current? worried! >> >> >> >> CC> The thing is, it isn't a matter of it being just one >> version off. For >> CC> instance. >> >> CC> DefaultApplicationAssembler: >> CC> version on barracudamvc.org = 1.8 >> CC> version on b.e.org = 1.12 >> CC> difference = 4 versions with >> 1.12 dating >> CC> back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago >> >> CC> ObjectRepositoryAssembler: >> CC> version on barracudamvc.org = 1.2 >> CC> version on b.e.org = 1.5 >> CC> difference = 3 versions with >> 1.5 dating >> CC> back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago >> >> CC> It is pretty obvious that 6 weeks and 1 day ago fell well >> before the time >> CC> of the CVS commit freeze at b.e.org. So, yes, we should ask >> Shawn about >> CC> what he thinks might have happened but, in the mean time, should we be >> CC> freezing commits barracudamvc.org or should we actively try to remedy >> CC> things? If anyone has a nice tool for diffing directories, >> it would be >> CC> helpful to compare the "src" directory from barracudamvc.org >> to that of >> CC> b.e.org. That would be the most important thing to check. >> Docs and such >> CC> might also be a concern, but probably less so. >> >> CC> Jake >> >> >> CC> At 08:18 PM 1/19/2003 -0700, you wrote: >> >> CC> Hi Jake, >> >> CC> Ok...this is really wierd...to the best of my knowledge, what's on >> CC> bmvc.org >> CC> should be the most current source; I will check with >> Shawn, but he won't >> CC> be >> CC> back until Tuesday morning. I know we pulled the source >> and then froze >> CC> the >> CC> b.e.org tree, so unless stuff got checked in after the >> freeze, it should >> CC> already be there on bmvc.org... >> >> CC> I will ask Shawn first thing Tesuday morning and get an >> answer. Is there >> CC> anything else which seems to be missing? >> >> CC> Christian >> >> CC> ---------------------------------------------- >> CC> Christian Cryder [[email protected]] >> CC> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com >> CC> Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org >> CC> ---------------------------------------------- >> CC> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" >> >> CC> > -----Original Message----- >> CC> > From: [email protected] >> CC> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of >> Jacob Kjome >> CC> > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:39 PM >> CC> > To: [email protected] >> CC> > Subject: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually >> current? worried! >> CC> > >> CC> > >> CC> > >> CC> > After I made my changes to allow the "catalina-deploy" >> task to work, I >> CC> > noticed problems with the DefaultApplicationAssembler. >> It was using >> CC> > absolute file paths to try to load the resources. I thought, >> CC> > that's weird, >> CC> > I fixed that a while back on the b.e.org server. So, >> I compared the >> CC> > latest version from b.e.org to barracudaMVC.org and was >> a bit shocked >> CC> to >> CC> > find out that the version there is utterly different from the >> CC> > latest one on >> CC> > b.e.org. It includes none of my changes which, once >> and for all, >> CC> fixed >> CC> > problems serving Barracuda directly out of a .war file. >> CC> > >> CC> > What is going on here? Why is the CVS source different? Wasn't >> CC> > the latest >> CC> > source imported from b.e.org? I'm going to go through >> and see if a >> CC> few >> CC> > other changes I made are still there or not. How many >> files might >> CC> this >> CC> > have happened to? In the meantime, I'm updating >> CC> > DefaultApplicationAssember >> CC> > to the version from b.e.org, because that is the correct one >> CC> > which actually >> CC> > works properly. >> CC> > >> CC> > Jake >> CC> > >> CC> > _______________________________________________ >> CC> > Barracuda mailing list >> CC> > [email protected] >> CC> > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda >> >> CC> _______________________________________________ >> CC> Barracuda mailing list >> CC> [email protected] >> CC> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Jacob mailto:[email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Barracuda mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda CC> _______________________________________________ CC> Barracuda mailing list CC> [email protected] CC> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda -- Best regards, Jacob mailto:[email protected]