RE: Re[2]: is the cvs source actually current? worried!

Hi Jake,

Why don't you just forward each of them to me, going back 6 weeks and 1
day...there shouldn't actually be very many, since the freeze date must have
been fairly close to that. My thinking here is that are probably only a
handful of files that changed on b.e.org prior to the freeze date...

I don't have a tool to do a directory wide diffs...maybe Shawn does...

Christian

----------------------------------------------
Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
----------------------------------------------
"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:05 AM
> To: Christian Cryder
> Subject: Re[2]: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually current? worried!
>
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> I think I have pretty much every barracuda-commit message from b.e.org
> for the last year or so.  It is all in Eudora at home so I won't be
> able to do anything about this until this evening.  What format would
> you like them exported to?  I'm not sure about all the export formats
> Eudora supports, but if I know in advance what would be useful to you
> and I find that Eudora supports it, then I can send it to in you your
> preferred format.
>
> That said, I think that maybe a directory comparison might work
> better here than
> fishing through all the barracuda-commit emails.  ExamDiffPro on Win32
> supports this quite nicely, but my trial ran out and it won't allow me
> to do recursive directory comparisons so it would kind of tedious to
> use until I get a license.
>
> These things happen.  I'm certainly disappointed, but we'll recover
> :-)
>
> Jake
>
> Monday, January 20, 2003, 9:22:51 AM, you wrote:
>
> CC> Crap. Looks like the barracuda-commit list has never been archived on
> CC> b.e.org, so there's no way to go back and find out exactly what was
> CC> committed...and I just cleaned out that mail folder last week
> on my machine
> CC> here. So...does anyone who is subscribed to the b.e.org
> commit list have
> CC> those messages archived on their box? If so, could you email
> them to me and
> CC> Jake? That would give us a list of things to check at least...
>
> CC> At this point, I think our best bet is to try and figure out where the
> CC> discrepencies are and to manually roll them forward.
>
> CC> grrr...sorry about this Jake...I thought we had that base
> covered. I'm just
> CC> glad you noticed it when you did...
>
> CC> Christian
> CC> ----------------------------------------------
> CC> Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
> CC> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
> CC> Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
> CC> ----------------------------------------------
> CC> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
> CC>   -----Original Message-----
> CC>   From: [email protected]
> CC> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
> CC>   Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:12 PM
> CC>   To: [email protected]
> CC>   Subject: RE: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually
> current? worried!
>
>
>
> CC>   The thing is, it isn't a matter of it being just one
> version off.  For
> CC> instance.
>
> CC>   DefaultApplicationAssembler:
> CC>   version on barracudamvc.org = 1.8
> CC>                     version on b.e.org = 1.12
> CC>                                  difference = 4 versions with
> 1.12 dating
> CC> back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago
>
> CC>   ObjectRepositoryAssembler:
> CC>   version on barracudamvc.org = 1.2
> CC>                     version on b.e.org = 1.5
> CC>                                  difference = 3 versions with
> 1.5 dating
> CC> back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago
>
> CC>   It is pretty obvious that 6 weeks and 1 day ago fell well
> before the time
> CC> of the CVS commit freeze at b.e.org.  So, yes, we should ask
> Shawn about
> CC> what he thinks might have happened but, in the mean time, should we be
> CC> freezing commits barracudamvc.org or should we actively try to remedy
> CC> things?  If anyone has a nice tool for diffing directories,
> it would be
> CC> helpful to compare the "src" directory from barracudamvc.org
> to that of
> CC> b.e.org.  That would be the most important thing to check.
> Docs and such
> CC> might also be a concern, but probably less so.
>
> CC>   Jake
>
>
> CC>   At 08:18 PM 1/19/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>
> CC>     Hi Jake,
>
> CC>     Ok...this is really wierd...to the best of my knowledge, what's on
> CC> bmvc.org
> CC>     should be the most current source; I will check with
> Shawn, but he won't
> CC> be
> CC>     back until Tuesday morning. I know we pulled the source
> and then froze
> CC> the
> CC>     b.e.org tree, so unless stuff got checked in after the
> freeze, it should
> CC>     already be there on bmvc.org...
>
> CC>     I will ask Shawn first thing Tesuday morning and get an
> answer. Is there
> CC>     anything else which seems to be missing?
>
> CC>     Christian
>
> CC>     ----------------------------------------------
> CC>     Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
> CC>     Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
> CC>     Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
> CC>     ----------------------------------------------
> CC>     "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
>
> CC>     > -----Original Message-----
> CC>     > From: [email protected]
> CC>     > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
> Jacob Kjome
> CC>     > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:39 PM
> CC>     > To: [email protected]
> CC>     > Subject: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually
> current? worried!
> CC>     >
> CC>     >
> CC>     >
> CC>     > After I made my changes to allow the "catalina-deploy"
> task to work, I
> CC>     > noticed problems with the DefaultApplicationAssembler.
> It was using
> CC>     > absolute file paths to try to load the resources.  I thought,
> CC>     > that's weird,
> CC>     > I fixed that a while back on the b.e.org server.   So,
> I compared the
> CC>     > latest version from b.e.org to barracudaMVC.org and was
> a bit shocked
> CC> to
> CC>     > find out that the version there is utterly different from the
> CC>     > latest one on
> CC>     > b.e.org.  It includes none of my changes which, once
> and for all,
> CC> fixed
> CC>     > problems serving Barracuda directly out of a .war file.
> CC>     >
> CC>     > What is going on here?  Why is the CVS source different?  Wasn't
> CC>     > the latest
> CC>     > source imported from b.e.org?  I'm going to go through
> and see if a
> CC> few
> CC>     > other changes I made are still there or not.  How many
> files might
> CC> this
> CC>     > have happened to?  In the meantime, I'm updating
> CC>     > DefaultApplicationAssember
> CC>     > to the version from b.e.org, because that is the correct one
> CC>     > which actually
> CC>     > works properly.
> CC>     >
> CC>     > Jake
> CC>     >
> CC>     > _______________________________________________
> CC>     > Barracuda mailing list
> CC>     > [email protected]
> CC>     > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
>
> CC>     _______________________________________________
> CC>     Barracuda mailing list
> CC>     [email protected]
> CC>     http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Jacob                            mailto:[email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Barracuda mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda