Re[2]: is the cvs source actually current? worried!
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.barracuda.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Springfield Nuclear Plant |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Christian, I think I have pretty much every barracuda-commit message from b.e.org for the last year or so. It is all in Eudora at home so I won't be able to do anything about this until this evening. What format would you like them exported to? I'm not sure about all the export formats Eudora supports, but if I know in advance what would be useful to you and I find that Eudora supports it, then I can send it to in you your preferred format. That said, I think that maybe a directory comparison might work better here than fishing through all the barracuda-commit emails. ExamDiffPro on Win32 supports this quite nicely, but my trial ran out and it won't allow me to do recursive directory comparisons so it would kind of tedious to use until I get a license. These things happen. I'm certainly disappointed, but we'll recover :-) Jake Monday, January 20, 2003, 9:22:51 AM, you wrote: CC> Crap. Looks like the barracuda-commit list has never been archived on CC> b.e.org, so there's no way to go back and find out exactly what was CC> committed...and I just cleaned out that mail folder last week on my machine CC> here. So...does anyone who is subscribed to the b.e.org commit list have CC> those messages archived on their box? If so, could you email them to me and CC> Jake? That would give us a list of things to check at least... CC> At this point, I think our best bet is to try and figure out where the CC> discrepencies are and to manually roll them forward. CC> grrr...sorry about this Jake...I thought we had that base covered. I'm just CC> glad you noticed it when you did... CC> Christian CC> ---------------------------------------------- CC> Christian Cryder [[email protected]] CC> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com CC> Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org CC> ---------------------------------------------- CC> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" CC> -----Original Message----- CC> From: [email protected] CC> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome CC> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:12 PM CC> To: [email protected] CC> Subject: RE: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually current? worried! CC> The thing is, it isn't a matter of it being just one version off. For CC> instance. CC> DefaultApplicationAssembler: CC> version on barracudamvc.org = 1.8 CC> version on b.e.org = 1.12 CC> difference = 4 versions with 1.12 dating CC> back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago CC> ObjectRepositoryAssembler: CC> version on barracudamvc.org = 1.2 CC> version on b.e.org = 1.5 CC> difference = 3 versions with 1.5 dating CC> back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago CC> It is pretty obvious that 6 weeks and 1 day ago fell well before the time CC> of the CVS commit freeze at b.e.org. So, yes, we should ask Shawn about CC> what he thinks might have happened but, in the mean time, should we be CC> freezing commits barracudamvc.org or should we actively try to remedy CC> things? If anyone has a nice tool for diffing directories, it would be CC> helpful to compare the "src" directory from barracudamvc.org to that of CC> b.e.org. That would be the most important thing to check. Docs and such CC> might also be a concern, but probably less so. CC> Jake CC> At 08:18 PM 1/19/2003 -0700, you wrote: CC> Hi Jake, CC> Ok...this is really wierd...to the best of my knowledge, what's on CC> bmvc.org CC> should be the most current source; I will check with Shawn, but he won't CC> be CC> back until Tuesday morning. I know we pulled the source and then froze CC> the CC> b.e.org tree, so unless stuff got checked in after the freeze, it should CC> already be there on bmvc.org... CC> I will ask Shawn first thing Tesuday morning and get an answer. Is there CC> anything else which seems to be missing? CC> Christian CC> ---------------------------------------------- CC> Christian Cryder [[email protected]] CC> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com CC> Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org CC> ---------------------------------------------- CC> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today" CC> > -----Original Message----- CC> > From: [email protected] CC> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome CC> > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:39 PM CC> > To: [email protected] CC> > Subject: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually current? worried! CC> > CC> > CC> > CC> > After I made my changes to allow the "catalina-deploy" task to work, I CC> > noticed problems with the DefaultApplicationAssembler. It was using CC> > absolute file paths to try to load the resources. I thought, CC> > that's weird, CC> > I fixed that a while back on the b.e.org server. So, I compared the CC> > latest version from b.e.org to barracudaMVC.org and was a bit shocked CC> to CC> > find out that the version there is utterly different from the CC> > latest one on CC> > b.e.org. It includes none of my changes which, once and for all, CC> fixed CC> > problems serving Barracuda directly out of a .war file. CC> > CC> > What is going on here? Why is the CVS source different? Wasn't CC> > the latest CC> > source imported from b.e.org? I'm going to go through and see if a CC> few CC> > other changes I made are still there or not. How many files might CC> this CC> > have happened to? In the meantime, I'm updating CC> > DefaultApplicationAssember CC> > to the version from b.e.org, because that is the correct one CC> > which actually CC> > works properly. CC> > CC> > Jake CC> > CC> > _______________________________________________ CC> > Barracuda mailing list CC> > [email protected] CC> > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda CC> _______________________________________________ CC> Barracuda mailing list CC> [email protected] CC> http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda -- Best regards, Jacob mailto:[email protected]