RE: is the cvs source actually current? worried!

Crap. Looks like the barracuda-commit list has never been archived on
b.e.org, so there's no way to go back and find out exactly what was
committed...and I just cleaned out that mail folder last week on my machine
here. So...does anyone who is subscribed to the b.e.org commit list have
those messages archived on their box? If so, could you email them to me and
Jake? That would give us a list of things to check at least...

At this point, I think our best bet is to try and figure out where the
discrepencies are and to manually roll them forward.

grrr...sorry about this Jake...I thought we had that base covered. I'm just
glad you noticed it when you did...

Christian
----------------------------------------------
Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
----------------------------------------------
"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
  Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:12 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: RE: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually current? worried!



  The thing is, it isn't a matter of it being just one version off.  For
instance.

  DefaultApplicationAssembler:
  version on barracudamvc.org = 1.8
                    version on b.e.org = 1.12
                                 difference = 4 versions with 1.12 dating
back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago

  ObjectRepositoryAssembler:
  version on barracudamvc.org = 1.2
                    version on b.e.org = 1.5
                                 difference = 3 versions with 1.5 dating
back to 6 weeks and 1 day ago

  It is pretty obvious that 6 weeks and 1 day ago fell well before the time
of the CVS commit freeze at b.e.org.  So, yes, we should ask Shawn about
what he thinks might have happened but, in the mean time, should we be
freezing commits barracudamvc.org or should we actively try to remedy
things?  If anyone has a nice tool for diffing directories, it would be
helpful to compare the "src" directory from barracudamvc.org to that of
b.e.org.  That would be the most important thing to check.  Docs and such
might also be a concern, but probably less so.

  Jake


  At 08:18 PM 1/19/2003 -0700, you wrote:

    Hi Jake,

    Ok...this is really wierd...to the best of my knowledge, what's on
bmvc.org
    should be the most current source; I will check with Shawn, but he won't
be
    back until Tuesday morning. I know we pulled the source and then froze
the
    b.e.org tree, so unless stuff got checked in after the freeze, it should
    already be there on bmvc.org...

    I will ask Shawn first thing Tesuday morning and get an answer. Is there
    anything else which seems to be missing?

    Christian

    ----------------------------------------------
    Christian Cryder [[email protected]]
    Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
    Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
    ----------------------------------------------
    "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [email protected]
    > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
    > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:39 PM
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: [Barracuda] is the cvs source actually current? worried!
    >
    >
    >
    > After I made my changes to allow the "catalina-deploy" task to work, I
    > noticed problems with the DefaultApplicationAssembler.  It was using
    > absolute file paths to try to load the resources.  I thought,
    > that's weird,
    > I fixed that a while back on the b.e.org server.   So, I compared the
    > latest version from b.e.org to barracudaMVC.org and was a bit shocked
to
    > find out that the version there is utterly different from the
    > latest one on
    > b.e.org.  It includes none of my changes which, once and for all,
fixed
    > problems serving Barracuda directly out of a .war file.
    >
    > What is going on here?  Why is the CVS source different?  Wasn't
    > the latest
    > source imported from b.e.org?  I'm going to go through and see if a
few
    > other changes I made are still there or not.  How many files might
this
    > have happened to?  In the meantime, I'm updating
    > DefaultApplicationAssember
    > to the version from b.e.org, because that is the correct one
    > which actually
    > works properly.
    >
    > Jake
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Barracuda mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda

    _______________________________________________
    Barracuda mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda