Re: POA Progress
David Forslund <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.enhydra.shark |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've made some progress on the POA implementation (replacing the BOA) in Shark. However, the right way to do this may require rethinking some aspects of what is in the CORBA interface for Shark. The POA provides lifecycle management capabilities which probably should be used to replace the code snippets used in the current implementation to control memory utilization. It seems to me that the Shark CORBA layer is just a window into the objects that are created underneath in the Shark Kernel. This can be utilized to properly activate the POA objects. In fact, there probably should be hierarchy of POA adapters for the variety of complex objects in Shark. I will make some stab at getting this done in my POA implementation, but I don't know if I know enough about the workings of Shark to get it all right. Any suggestions in this area would be greatly appreciated. The javaworld articles on the "new" CORBA POA capabilities (2002) are helpful in this regard. Thanks, Dave
message.footer
(text/plain, 271 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws