RE: Spice-* and Loom
"Peter@Stock" <peter-4lf8KW9E9MLMqX/[email protected]> Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:09:16 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jcontainer.interest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Done. > -----Original Message----- > From: jcontainer-interest-admin-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org [mailto:jcontainer- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter@Stock > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:45 AM > To: jcontainer-interest-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org > Subject: Spice-* and Loom > > One thing I have been thinking about is what we should do about the > relationship between loom and spice-xmlpolicy, spice-extension and > spice-classman. They are all very specific to loom and in retrospect are > unlikely to be used anywhere else. What I was thinking was that we could > migrate into loom package hierarchy. It would not be any real change for > anything but hopefully then we can reduce extra work of maintaining > separately. Ie We would end up merging all the docs into Loom website but > everything else will stay separate. > > Cheers, > > Peter Donald > > *-----------------------------------------------------* > * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * > * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * > * everyone gets busy on the proof." * > * - John Kenneth Galbraith * > *-----------------------------------------------------* > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jcontainer-interest-admin-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org [mailto:jcontainer- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of peter royal > > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 10:02 PM > > To: jcontainer-interest-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org > > Subject: Re: Release > > > > On Mar 28, 2004, at 9:59 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > While we are waiting for MetaClass infrastructure @ Codehaus to be > > > created > > > is there anything else that needs doing in jcontainer that I can hack > > > on? > > > > I somewhat re-organized the issues in jira.. after talking with mauro > > most of what i have slated for 1.0 can really be pushed to 1.1 and then > > a 1.0 can be cut sometime soon... maybe take a peek in there and see if > > there is anything that needs doing that interests ya > > -pete > > _______________________________________________ > jcontainer-interest mailing list > jcontainer-interest-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org > http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/jcontainer-interest