Re: New build of ComponentHaus

Mike Hogan wrote:

> Yes, there is a 1-to-1 between class/interface and "component".  Well, more
> accurately, a component is a collection of ServiceMethod instances.  Can you
> point me towards some source of a component that is split across more than one
> class?  I'll see how that could be made to work.

well, I always think of a component as a set of class/interfaces.
take for example any of the spice components.
seems to me that mapping should be more generically between a component 
and its jar.
Because an interface in a component may reference another interface or 
class in the api of the component.
There are some classes that cannot easily sit by themselves.

Does this make sense?  Or are we talking two different things?

Cheers