Re: [subscriptions] Re: New build of ComponentHaus

Hi Mauro,

> well, I always think of a component as a set of class/interfaces.
> take for example any of the spice components.
> seems to me that mapping should be more generically between a component
> and its jar.
> Because an interface in a component may reference another interface or
> class in the api of the component.
> There are some classes that cannot easily sit by themselves.

True.  Can you point me to a specific example in the spice CVS (pardon my
laziness :-) ?

> Does this make sense?  Or are we talking two different things?

No, we are talking about the same thing.  Componenthaus is just very
immature yet - we'll get it there eventually.

Cheers,
Mike.