Re: jdom 1.1
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I optimized my code like you said and it's much faster like predicted. (Thank you for the remark!) But.... jdom 1.1 remains slower. for the 25 MB xml-file 4 seconds with jdom 1.0 and 5 seconds with jdom 1.1 for the 73 MB xml-file 12 seconds with jdom 1.0 and 17 seconds with jdom 1.1 Of course because of the optimalization from n² to n, the difference in time is also much smaller. It would be strange if suddenly the difference in time was disappeared. Because the changes I did had nothing to do with jdom itself. I think my reasoning is logic or am I wrong somewhere? Dit bericht is onderworpen aan de voorwaarden beschikbaar op onze website Ce message est soumis aux conditions disponibles sur notre site web This message is subject to the terms and conditions available on our website _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]