Re: Java Memory Model and ParallelStream

Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/6/20 9:35 AM, Luke Hutchison via Concurrency-interest wrote:

> If the CPU does not have a total store order, I could imagine cases
> where a computational barrier does not enforce memory ordering. What am
> I missing?

You are missing us not having our act together and turning the guide at
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/html/j9mm.html along with most of a
formalization at http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/papers/jam/ into a spec
update. Any year now...

-Doug


_______________________________________________
Concurrency-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.